eigenmath/doc/ross/ross-18.2.tex

26 lines
958 B
TeX

\beginsection 18.2
Reread the proof of Theorem 18.1 with $[a,b]$ replaced by $(a,b)$.
Where does it break down? Discuss.
\medskip
Try going through the proof line by line replacing $[a,b]$ with $(a,b)$.
1. Assume that $f$ is not bounded on $(a,b)$. {\it Ok.}
2. Then to each $n\in N$ there corresponds an $x_n\in (a,b)$ such that
$|f(x_n)|>n$. {\it Ok, because f is unbounded.}
3. By the B-W Theorem 11.5, $(x_n)$ has a subsequence $(x_{n_k})$ that converges
to some real number $x_0$.
{\it Ok, because $x_n$ is bounded on $(a,b)$.}
4. The number $x_0$ must also belong to the open interval $(a,b)$.
{\it Uh-oh, here's a problem, $x_0$ may be equal to $a$ or $b$ in the limit.}
5. Since $f$ is continuous at $x_0$, we have $\lim f(x_{n_k})=f(x_0)$,
but we also have $\lim|f(x_{n_k})|=+\infty$ which is a contradiction.
{\it If $x_0$ is equal to $a$ or $b$ then $f$ doesn't have to be continuous
there so we cannot say that $\lim f(x_{n_k})=f(x_0)$.}